<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rock n Music Review.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com</link>
	<description>Rock Music Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Happened to Radiohead?</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=89</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=89#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alt Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brit Pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought they were the world&#8217;s greatest band during the &#8220;Bends&#8221; and &#8220;Ok Computer&#8221;. They were a band that could play soft and heavy within the same tune, which made them a throwback to the classic rock period. I think today, many modern bands try to mine the same musical vein, and are monochromatic, whereas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were the world&#8217;s greatest band during the &#8220;Bends&#8221; and &#8220;Ok Computer&#8221;. They were a band that could play soft and heavy within the same tune, which made them a throwback to the classic rock period. I think today, many modern bands try to mine the same musical vein, and are monochromatic, whereas RH was way more versatile. Unfortunately, they developed such an arrogant attitude, that they believed anything they did was brilliant, and lost all objectivity, and consequently released a series of albums that did nothing for me. Most recently, &#8220;Hail to to the Thief&#8221;, can only be described as a difficult album, covering many musical styles, but failing to rein the album into a unifying whole. Some of the songs are virtually unlistenable, which I never would have thought possible for a band that produced the first 2 mention albums. I thought if they would have focused more on the stoner rock sounds of &#8220;There, There&#8221;, and used those rhythms and grooves throughout the album, they would have really had something.</p>
<p>I understand, making your fans &#8220;work&#8221; to listen to music is fine. I guess you could call it art. But RH artistic decision to follow this course has lead them to relative obscurity, which is unfortunate because they still have the talent to have both artistic and commercial success. Few avante garde records such as Kid A have sold such numbers, and I&#8217;m sure Thom and the boys were laughing all the way to the bank, however it led them into a musical deadend. &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221; was a nice record, much easier listening than HTTT, but what the heck happened to the band that could rock out?  Like everyone else, I&#8217;m eagerly anticipating they&#8217;re next cd&#8230;if there will be one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=89</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Melvins Could Have Ruled the World</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=87</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doom Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grunge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner Rock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Melvins Could Have Ruled the World
So we all suspect King Buzzo and Dale would rather live in their apartments collecting royalty checks and smoking dope, than be mega famous rock stars. They could have turned the &#8220;commercial&#8221; rock world upon its head, but left that to Nirvana, while they strive to remain in obscurity, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Melvins Could Have Ruled the World</p>
<p>So we all suspect King Buzzo and Dale would rather live in their apartments collecting royalty checks and smoking dope, than be mega famous rock stars. They could have turned the &#8220;commercial&#8221; rock world upon its head, but left that to Nirvana, while they strive to remain in obscurity, always subverting their success by submarining their albums with crazing ambient experimental compositions which left fans wondering &#8220;what the #$&#038;@*?&#8221; Okay, so after 20 years of recording and too many cds to name, we can now pull those awesome tracks the Melvins tantalized us with, but refused to deliver in mass. Example?&#8230;&#8221;Revolve&#8221; for STONER WITCH. It&#8217;s a crazy album, but this tune rocks harder than anything Metallica or Nirvana ever did. In fact, Hetfield and Cobain could only dream of singing and playing guitar as well as Buzzo could&#8230;when he wanted to. It&#8217;s time for the Melvins to prove they produced the greatest metal, albiet spread throughout many albums, ever recorded in the history of rock. Eventhough they&#8217;ve shunned the spotlight, lets put together a compilation that will get recognition for what they were&#8230;the greatest band of the 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Houdini, (A) Senile Animal and Ozma, all good. I&#8217;d also include Bullhead..very solid album, except for the drum solo at the end. Check out track #4 &#8220;It Shoved&#8221;. Classic Buzzo snarling/growling vocal, killer riff and clocking in at a whopping 2:30 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=87</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Pistols v The Ramones</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Punk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The obvious knock against the Pistols is they only released one proper album, while the Ramones released a series of great records in the 70&#8217;s.  That&#8217;s very true, but releasing albums was not the essence of punk.
Let&#8217;s refocus for a second to what Punk Rock tried to do in the mid 70&#8217;s&#8230;essentially blowup the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious knock against the Pistols is they only released one proper album, while the Ramones released a series of great records in the 70&#8217;s.  That&#8217;s very true, but releasing albums was not the essence of punk.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s refocus for a second to what Punk Rock tried to do in the mid 70&#8217;s&#8230;essentially blowup the elitist AOR rock culture which began with Sgt. Pepper. As concept albums became more ambitious and complex, groups became more pompous and out of touch with audiences. Groups were using orchestras, over-dubs, session players, making their music very inaccessible to the up and coming garage bands. So along comes punk, erasing the Classic Rock era, and rewinding music to the late 50&#8217;s&#8230;and era when rock was basic, artists didn&#8217;t have to record 10 songs for and album and when the vast majority of people bought single 45&#8217;s, not long playing 33 and a thirds. It was no coincidence that &#8220;God Save the Queen&#8221;, &#8220;Pretty Vacant&#8221;, &#8220;Anarchy in the UK&#8221;, could only be purchased as 45&#8217;s upon their initial release. Not only did these singles absolutely rock harder than anything since &#8220;Live at Leeds&#8221;, they were also the Pistols attempt to subvert the music industry which pushed &#8220;singles&#8221; to sell more expensive and more profitable albums. Later the singles were compiled for &#8220;Never Mind the Bullocks&#8221;, and as a result, it sounds like a bunch of singles, not a perfectly selected sequence of tunes, which on the other hand, is exactly the way &#8220;Rocket to Russia&#8221; plays, making the Ramones much more similar to Classic Rock than the Pistols. This was a profound difference between the two bands&#8230;one was a singles bands, the other AOR and AOR ladies and gentlemen, is not punk.</p>
<p>Punk was more than just recording retro-records. The Pistols were fresh because they emphasized 45s and songs with biting social criticism. If an early 60&#8217;s sound were the sole benchmark for punk, then I&#8217;d put the NY Dolls ahead of the Ramones because they recorded &#8220;Too Much, Too Soon&#8221;, back in 1974, with legendary 60&#8217;s producer, Shadow Morton.</p>
<p><a href="http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=29">Sex Pistols &#8211; Never Mind the Bullocks</a>, <a href="http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=30">The Ramones &#8211; Rocket to Russia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beatles Vs The Rolling Stones Pt. 2</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=73</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=73#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[70s Hard Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the rolling stones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best bands are the ones that are most influential, outside of their era. That&#8217;s what you call timeless. The Stones created modern rock music and flourished, while the Beatles collapsed. A big reason why the Beatles couldn’t survive in this new era was because they didn’t possess the level of musicianship of the Stones, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best bands are the ones that are most influential, outside of their era. That&#8217;s what you call timeless. The Stones created modern rock music and flourished, while the Beatles collapsed. A big reason why the Beatles couldn’t survive in this new era was because they didn’t possess the level of musicianship of the Stones, the Who, Cream, Jim Hendrix, etc. The era of the Beatles’ simple pop tunes (Eleanor Rigby, etc.) gave way to the Super Group, so realizing they were no match musically, they wisely quit. Left alone at the top, the Stones went on to influence many bands including Aerosmith and AC/DC (Bon Scott era), both harder rocking rhythm and blues bands. Motorhead then took hard rock R&amp;B and speeded it up. Metallica followed Motorhead and added and Industrial influence, turning the rhythm guitar into a jackhammer and turning the blues based guitar solos into a tour de force blitz krieg. After Metallica, Sepultura elevated the guitar rhythms to an extreme level. The core groove or “head-banging” experienced in thrash and first generation of death metal all directly relates back to the R&amp;B hard rock created by Stones. On the other hand, the Beatles influence died with them in the late 60’s.</p>
<p><strong>Mick Taylor Vs. George Harrison</strong></p>
<p>Taylor would have slaughtered Harrison and would have held his own against Clapton.  If you don&#8217;t think Harrison was mediocre at best, consider these two things.</p>
<p>1.) The documentary &#8220;Let it Be&#8221; documents the trouble Paul had getting Harrison to play the guitar parts for his songs. He complained that every time he tried suggest how the part was to be played, Harrison would give him the attitude, &#8220;I&#8217;m George Harrison&#8230;you can&#8217;t tell me how to play!&#8221;, and would end up doing it his way.</p>
<p>2.) Between the recording of Let it Be and Abbey Road, Lennon began forming the Plastic Ono band featuring Clapton himself. If Harrison was so great, why would Lennon even consider forming a Supergroup with Clapton, while still a Beatle? Lennon also included Alan White, a real rock drumer. At this point, I won&#8217;t even get into Ringo/Watts comparasons.</p>
<p>The art in rock music is that it totally subverts what&#8217;s accepted as normal popular music. Do I really have to explain that? By nature, it&#8217;s politically incorrect, and challenges the pop culture of what&#8217;s accepted. For instance, &#8220;Brown Sugar&#8221; was ballsy then, and it&#8217;s still ballsy today. In fact, no radio station will play it. On the other hand, &#8220;Elenear Rigby&#8221; can be heard in super-markets and dentist offices because it&#8217;s soothing and harmless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=73</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diary of a Madman 95&#8242; vs Diary of a Madman 02&#8242;</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=74</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=74#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthem Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hair Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWOBHM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diary of a Madman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozzy Osbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Rhodes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the first time in history, bass and drums have been rerecorded by different players on a classic. IMO 02&#8242; remix smokes the 95 remaster.  Some may say it&#8217;s just an excuse for Sharon Osbourne to cheat 2 musicians out of money so she can buy another boob job or a gold plated yappy dog.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in history, bass and drums have been rerecorded by different players on a classic. IMO 02&#8242; remix smokes the 95 remaster.  Some may say it&#8217;s just an excuse for Sharon Osbourne to cheat 2 musicians out of money so she can buy another boob job or a gold plated yappy dog.  Give me a break! She&#8217;s got enough money for 100 tit jobs.</p>
<p>Regardless of motivation, the sound quality is a vast improvement. Much thicker bottom end, Randy&#8217;s guitar work sounds a lot more aggressive, and of course Ozzy&#8217;s voice is more full sounding. Overall, an updated more metal in your face mix.  Admittedly, the mix of Rhodes&#8217; guitar solo during tonight is a little muddy in the 02&#8242; version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=74</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Bloody Valentine &#8211; Loveless Over-rated?</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=75</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alt Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indy Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocteau Twins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus and Marychain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loveless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Bloody Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought My Bloody Valentine&#8217;s &#8211; Loveless was on to an interesting idea, fusing Jesus and Mary Chain noise pop with the ethereal rhythms of Cocteau Twins, but lacked the song-writing prowess to turn this into a classic. The good songs tend to sound similar and the boring ones stagnant and would benefit if they&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought My Bloody Valentine&#8217;s &#8211; Loveless was on to an interesting idea, fusing Jesus and Mary Chain noise pop with the ethereal rhythms of Cocteau Twins, but lacked the song-writing prowess to turn this into a classic. The good songs tend to sound similar and the boring ones stagnant and would benefit if they&#8217;d been shortened (filler perhaps?). The publicity it received in the early 90&#8217;s was very good, making many top 10 lists, but has waned recently, because it’s one of those albums that’s decent, but derivative.  Not that the distorted  trance-like rhythms are bad, it&#8217;s just IMO  Jesus and Marychains&#8217; massive influence overshadowing &#8220;Loveless&#8221;.   As I said it&#8217;s not a bad record. IMO it’s more of a derivation of &#8220;Psycho Candy&#8217;s&#8221; pop melodies and dirty distorted guitars, than an &#8220;evolution&#8221;.  However if you never heard of JAMC or the Cocteau Twins, then all I can say is ignorance is bliss and enjoy this record.  But when I listen to MBV, i begin to lose interest half way through a song and start thinking, that sounds like J&amp;MC, or they remind me of Cocteau Twins, or maybe Bauhaus or Sonic Youth. Great bands absorb influences into something new, whereas bands that fall short, wear them on their sleeve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=75</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Stoner Rock/Stoner Metal?</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=76</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doom Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Sabbath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stooges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definition is not narrow, but broadly ranges from heavy doom to 70&#8217;s garage rock, a little bit of prog. and plenty of fuzz and detuned guitar riffs.
1970 Stooges FUN HOUSE, had the most direct influence on artists such as Nebula, Fu Manchu, Monster Magnet, as well as Kyuss. The raw dirty unpolished low-fi sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definition is not narrow, but broadly ranges from heavy doom to 70&#8217;s garage rock, a little bit of prog. and plenty of fuzz and detuned guitar riffs.</p>
<p>1970 Stooges FUN HOUSE, had the most direct influence on artists such as Nebula, Fu Manchu, Monster Magnet, as well as Kyuss. The raw dirty unpolished low-fi sound was a hallmark characteristic of many of their early recordings. This is in stark contrast to the 60&#8217;s garage bands like the 13 Floor Elevators, The Seeds, The Shadows of Night, Nazz  and IMO all seem too polished and singles oriented, which is the complete opposite of most 90&#8217;s stoner bands.</p>
<p>On the other end of the Stoner spectrum, you have bands influenced by Black Sabbath, specifically their &#8220;Masters of Reality&#8221; release which featured huge, heavy and doom laiden riffs that were as catchy as they were pulverizing.  Also the fact that the album features the song &#8220;Sweet Leaf&#8221; helped make it an influential darling amongst the stoner set.   Here&#8217;s a lits of some quality Stoner tunes.  Another influential and important proto-stoner band was a Welsh band named Budgie, which also featured a dirty low-end sound, catchy riffs and low-fi records.</p>
<p>Spirit Caravan &#8211; Fang<br />
High On Fire &#8211; Master of Fist<br />
Orange Goblin &#8211; Black Egg<br />
Kyuss &#8211; One Inch Man<br />
Fu Manchu &#8211; Anodizer<br />
Monster Magnet &#8211; Negasonic Teenage Warhead<br />
Trouble &#8211; Hello Strawberry Skies</p>
<p>Influential Proto-Stoner Songs<br />
Budgie &#8211; Nude Disintegrating Parachutist Woman</p>
<p>Black Sabbath &#8211; Sweet Leaf</p>
<p>The Stooges &#8211; I Need Someone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=76</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>35 Greatest Guitar Songs of All Time</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=72</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=72#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[70s Hard Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alt Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthem Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hair Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner Rock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Megadeth &#8211; Hanger 18
2. UFO &#8211; Rock Bottom
3. The Allman Brothers Band &#8211; &#8220;Whipping Post&#8221;
4. Lou Reed &#8211; The Blue Mask
5. Black Sabbath &#8211; &#8220;Supernaut&#8221;
6. The Clash &#8211; Complete Control
7. Mountain &#8211; Mississippi Queen
8. Ted Nugent &#8211; Stranglehold
9. Robin Trower &#8211; Too Rolling Stoned
10. Echo and the Bunneymen &#8211; With a Hip
11. BOC &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Megadeth &#8211; Hanger 18<br />
2. UFO &#8211; Rock Bottom<br />
3. The Allman Brothers Band &#8211; &#8220;Whipping Post&#8221;<br />
4. Lou Reed &#8211; The Blue Mask<br />
5. Black Sabbath &#8211; &#8220;Supernaut&#8221;<br />
6. The Clash &#8211; Complete Control<br />
7. Mountain &#8211; Mississippi Queen<br />
8. Ted Nugent &#8211; Stranglehold<br />
9. Robin Trower &#8211; Too Rolling Stoned<br />
10. Echo and the Bunneymen &#8211; With a Hip<br />
11. BOC &#8211; Godzilla<br />
12. Queen &#8211; Stone Cold Fever<br />
13. The Stooges &#8211; Loose<br />
14. Faith no More &#8211; War Pigs<br />
15. Band of Gypsies &#8211; Power of Love<br />
16. Janes Addiction &#8211; Pigs in Zen<br />
17. Montrose &#8211; Rock Candy<br />
18. Foghat &#8211; I Just Want to Make Love to You<br />
19. Yes &#8211; Siberian Khatru<br />
20. Bad Company &#8211; Deal With the Preacher<br />
21. Boris &#8211; Rattlesnake<br />
22. Deep Purple &#8211; &#8220;Smoke on the Water&#8221;<br />
23. Motorhead &#8211; Ace of Spades<br />
24. Black Label Society &#8211; All For You<br />
25. Gang of Four &#8211; To Hell w/ Poverty<br />
26. Michael Jackson &#8211; &#8220;Beat It&#8221;<br />
27. Melvins &#8211; Revolve<br />
28. Hot Tuna &#8211; Funky #7<br />
29. King Crimson &#8211; 21st Century Schizoid Man<br />
30. Scorpions &#8211; Speedy&#8217;s Coming<br />
31. Kiss &#8211; &#8220;Strutter&#8221;<br />
32. Aerosmith &#8211; Nobody&#8217;s Fault<br />
33. QOTSA &#8211; Song For the Deaf<br />
34. Red Hot Chilli Peppers &#8211; If You Have to Ask<br />
35. Velvet Underground &#8211; Sister Ray<br />
BONUS &#8211; The Cult &#8211; Love Removal Machine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=72</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beatles Vs The Rolling Stones</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=71</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=71#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[70s Hard Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the rolling stones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s the guitar, stupid! The Stones invented the rhythm/lead guitar combination with Jones/Richards and perfected it when Mick Taylor arrived. They laid the foundation for thrash and death metal. Hetfield/Hammett, Cavalera/Kisser, Peterson/Skolnick, King/Hanneman all used the same rhythm guitarist and soloist setup. Not to mention Beggar Banquet, Let it Bleed, Get Your Ya Yas, Stickey [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the guitar, stupid! The Stones invented the rhythm/lead guitar combination with Jones/Richards and perfected it when Mick Taylor arrived. They laid the foundation for thrash and death metal. Hetfield/Hammett, Cavalera/Kisser, Peterson/Skolnick, King/Hanneman all used the same rhythm guitarist and soloist setup. Not to mention Beggar Banquet, Let it Bleed, Get Your Ya Yas, Stickey Fingers, Exile on Main St., and It&#8217;s Only Rock N Roll &#8230; six consecutive masterpieces produced by the hottest band ever. In fact, they were on such a roll, they caused the collapse of a national government. Did I mention the Stones are the world greatest rock n&#8217; roll band?</p>
<p>Harrison was never considered a great soloist and consequently Beatle tunes are not remembered for their guitar work. Yes other bands had two guitarists, but it was the Stones who first featured a blues soloist and rhythm guitarists and structured their songs around them. When Taylor joined up, it was like the Stones getting Eric Clapton&#8230;their state of the art fret master. In fact it was the Stones who influenced the Beatles in this department when George and John started to jam Stones-like on the last song of Abbey Road, which was part of Lennon&#8217;s scheme to try to bring the Beatles into the &#8220;purer&#8221; harder rock territory of the Stones.</p>
<p>The Beatles string of albums are very respected, but compare the themes explored within them. On the one hand you got &#8220;Fixing a Hole&#8221;, &#8220;Ticket to Ride&#8221;, &#8220;Penny Lane&#8221;, &#8220;She&#8217;s Leaving Home&#8221;, basically a bunch of sappy, banal, personal stuff, and on the other hand you got &#8220;Sympathy for the Devil&#8221;, &#8220;Street Fighting Man&#8221;, &#8220;Bitch&#8221; and &#8220;Brown Sugar&#8221;, tough songs digging into the dark side of the human psyche which ushered in the dark era of rock n roll. The Stones were the first princes of Darkness and as you mentioned also paved the way for Sabbath, Zepplin and Deep Purple. The Stones and their &#8220;dark aura&#8221; dominated the 60&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s as well as still being influential today. I think it&#8217;s obvious that in the mythical battle between good vs evil, between light and dark, between the Beatles and the Stones&#8230;the Stones have won.</p>
<p>But, if I was forced to boil it down to one thing, the Beatles don&#8217;t have a song as good as &#8220;Satisfaction&#8221;.</p>
<p>As far toppling a government, Maggie Trudeau, the first lady of Canada decided to ditch your husbands re-election campaign so she could get banged by Woodie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=71</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mastodon &#8211; Crack the Skye Album Review</title>
		<link>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=70</link>
		<comments>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=70#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocknmusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doom Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prog Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crack the Skye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mastodon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocknmusicreview.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a dramatic departure for Mastodon. Much more metalcore than a continuation of their brand of sludge/prog/death metal. The clean vocals are very pedestrian and I believe are only done for the mallcore crowd.  Personally, I loved their hardcore screams and indifferent stoner vocal delivery of the past.  Brann Dailor still drums like a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a dramatic departure for Mastodon. Much more metalcore than a continuation of their brand of sludge/prog/death metal. The clean vocals are very pedestrian and I believe are only done for the mallcore crowd.  Personally, I loved their hardcore screams and indifferent stoner vocal delivery of the past.  Brann Dailor still drums like a tsunami, but the guitar riffs are a lot less thrashy. Infact, the mathcore tightly coiled rhythm guitar is virtually absent, replaced with time tested guitar hero solos inserted in every song.  There are times on this album, when Mastodon starts sounding derivative, such as the much ballyhooed &#8220;The Czar: Usurper/Escape/Martyr/SpiralInvariable&#8221; which reminds of of Rush crossed pollinated with QoTSA.  Bands go directions that I don&#8217;t find interesting and lose me, and this may be the case with the Mastodon, but I&#8217;m going to give this one more time because I love this band.<br />
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=rocnmusrev-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=B001R4MEYI&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=000000&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rocknmusicreview.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=70</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
